United States v. Porter

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Porter. Read the opinion of the Court — 338 F. App'x 300
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2009·No. 08-6758·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6758

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EMJADIA PORTER, a/k/a Troy Miller,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:94-cr-00037-sgw)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 4, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emjadia Porter, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Emjadia Porter appeals the district court’s orders

granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Porter, No. 7:94-cr-00037-sgw (W.D. Va.

Apr. 7 & 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Porter, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Porter (United States v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related