United States v. Porter

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Porter. Read the opinion of the Court — 338 F. App'x 300
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 25, 2008·No. 08-6648·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6648

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLYDE E. PORTER, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00085-JRS-1)

Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 25, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clyde E. Porter, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Staige Davis, V, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clyde E. Porter, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Porter, No. 3:00-cr-00085-

JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Porter, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Porter (United States v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related