United States v. Pimentel-Lopez

859 F.3d 1134, 2016 WL 9076502
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 15, 2016
DocketNo. 14-30210
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 859 F.3d 1134 (United States v. Pimentel-Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Pimentel-Lopez, 859 F.3d 1134, 2016 WL 9076502 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinions

Dissent to Order by Judge GRABE R

[1136]*1136ORDER

The opinion filed July 15, 2016, and appearing at 828 F.3d 1173, is AMENDED as reflected in the attached amended opinion. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing will be considered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Batista
Tenth Circuit, 2024
United States v. Xavier Greene
Fourth Circuit, 2024
United States v. Ryan Taybron
Fourth Circuit, 2024
United States v. Martin Hunt
99 F.4th 161 (Fourth Circuit, 2024)
United States v. Eric Nixon
Fourth Circuit, 2024
United States v. Kielan Franklin
18 F.4th 1105 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Jermaine Hardiman
982 F.3d 1234 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Cook v. United States
S.D. New York, 2020
United States v. John Leontaritis
977 F.3d 447 (Fifth Circuit, 2020)
Yost v. United States
D. Nevada, 2020
United States v. Gary Jacques
Second Circuit, 2020
United States v. Armando Vera
893 F.3d 689 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
859 F.3d 1134, 2016 WL 9076502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pimentel-lopez-ca9-2016.