United States v. Pimentel-Lopez
859 F.3d 1134, 2016 WL 9076502
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 15, 2016·No. No. 14-30210·Published·Cited by 28 cases
Opinions
Dissent to Order by Judge GRABE R
[1136] ORDER
The opinion filed July 15, 2016, and appearing at 828 F.3d 1173, is AMENDED as reflected in the attached amended opinion. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing will be considered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Pimentel-Lopez, 859 F.3d 1134, 2016 WL 9076502 (9th Cir. 2016).
859 F.3d 1134 (United States v. Pimentel-Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Batista
Tenth Circuit, 2024
United States v. Xavier Greene
Fourth Circuit, 2024
United States v. Ryan Taybron
Fourth Circuit, 2024
United States v. Raymond Palmer
Fourth Circuit, 2024
United States v. Martin Hunt
99 F.4th 161 (Fourth Circuit, 2024)
United States v. Geovanni Douglas
Fourth Circuit, 2024
United States v. Eric Nixon
Fourth Circuit, 2024
United States v. Deshaun Richardson
Fourth Circuit, 2024
Chase Lee Collins v. William Sullivan
C.D. California, 2023
United States v. Kielan Franklin
18 F.4th 1105 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Henry Cervantes
Ninth Circuit, 2021
United States v. Jermaine Hardiman
982 F.3d 1234 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)
Cook v. United States
S.D. New York, 2020
United States v. John Leontaritis
977 F.3d 447 (Fifth Circuit, 2020)
Yost v. United States
D. Nevada, 2020
United States v. Gary Jacques
Second Circuit, 2020
United States v. Jesus Pimentel-Lopez
Ninth Circuit, 2018
United States v. Jesse Davenport
Ninth Circuit, 2018
United States v. MacRina Blanco Tedtaotao
Ninth Circuit, 2018
United States v. Armando Vera
893 F.3d 689 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)