United States v. Perez

26 F. App'x 324
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 F. App'x 227
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 6, 2002·No. 01-4565·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ruben Perez appeals his conviction pursuant to a guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841 (West 1999 & Supp.2001). Because 21 U.S.C.A. § 841 is' not rendered unconstitutional by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), which is the sole issue Perez asserts on appeal, we affirm Perez’s conviction and sentence. See United States v. McAllister, 272 F.3d 228, 232 (4th Cir.2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Perez, 26 F. App'x 324 (4th Cir. 2002).

26 F. App'x 324 (United States v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Keith Andre McAllister
272 F.3d 228 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)