United States v. Perez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 F. App'x 227
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 24, 1999·No. 98-7470·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7470

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JULIO CESAR PEREZ, a/k/a Jose Luis Villarreal,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-305, CA-98-1494-3-17)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 24, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lionel Aron Pena, Sr., Edinburg, Texas, for Appellant. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Julio Cesar Perez seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Perez, Nos. CR-96-305;

CA-98-1494-3-17 (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Perez, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Perez (United States v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related