United States v. Perez

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6325

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSE ANGEL PEREZ, a/k/a Angel,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-93-26-F, CA-97-85-7-F)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 27, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jay Stephen Neisen, ZIMMER & ZIMMER, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States At- torney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Perez, Nos. CR-93-26-F; CA-97-85-7-F

(E.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED