United States v. Perez
This text of 65 F. App'x 495 (United States v. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Augustine Perez appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pleadings which attempted to challenge his convictions through a petition for writ of audita querela and under former Fed. R.Crim. P 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. - Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Perez, No. CR-90-112-L (W.D.Va. May 16, 2001; Dec. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 F. App'x 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-perez-ca4-2003.