United States v. Perez

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Perez

65 F. App'x 495

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2003·No. 03-6244·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Augustine Perez appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pleadings which attempted to challenge his convictions through a petition for writ of audita querela and under former Fed. R.Crim. P 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. - Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Perez, No. CR-90-112-L (W.D.Va. May 16, 2001; Dec. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Augustine Perez appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pleadings which attempted to challenge his convictions through a petition for writ of audita querela and under former Fed. R.Crim. P 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. - Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Perez, No. CR-90-112-L (W.D.Va. May 16, 2001; Dec. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Perez, 65 F. App'x 495 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

65 F. App'x 495 (United States v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.