United States v. Perez

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

May 13, 1996

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT


____________________


No. 95-2195



                                    UNITED STATES,



                                      Appellee,



                                          v.



                                     ALINA PEREZ,



                                Defendant, Appellant.


____________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                     [Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________

                            Cyr and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________



                                 ____________________



            Lenore Glaser on brief for appellant.
            _____________

            Donald K. Stern, United  States Attorney, and  Michael J.  Pelgro,
            _______________                                __________________

        Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.


____________________


____________________


Per Curiam.   In view  of our recent  opinion clarifying
                 __________



that  a  sentencing  court  "may  invoke    4A1.3  to  depart



            downward from  the career  offender category if  it concludes



            that  the  category  inaccurately  reflects  the  defendant's



            actual criminal  history,"  United States v.  Lindia, No. 95-
                                        ________________________



            2200, slip op. at 21 (1st Cir. April 18, 1996), together with



            our   uncertainty  whether   the   district   court  made   a



            discretionary decision not to  depart or, instead, viewed its



            authority as  more restricted  than Lindia allows,  we vacate
                                                ______



            the sentence and remand for further consideration. 



                 Vacated and remanded.  Loc. R. 27.1.
                 ____________________


-3-