United States v. Perez

86 F.3d 1147, 1996 WL 246078
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 F.3d 632
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided May 13, 1996·No. 95-2195·Unpublished

Opinion

86 F.3d 1147

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v.
Alina PEREZ, Defendant, Appellant.

No. 95-2195.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

May 13, 1996.

Lenore Glaser on brief for appellant.

Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Michael J. Pelgro, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.

Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, CYR and LYNCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In view of our recent opinion clarifying that a sentencing court "may invoke § 4A1.3 to depart downward from the career offender category if it concludes that the category inaccurately reflects the defendant's actual criminal history," United States v. Lindia, No. 95-2200, slip op. at 21 (1st Cir. April 18, 1996), together with our uncertainty whether the district court made a discretionary decision not to depart or, instead, viewed its authority as more restricted than Lindia allows, we vacate the sentence and remand for further consideration.

Vacated and remanded. Loc. R. 27.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Perez, 86 F.3d 1147, 1996 WL 246078 (1st Cir. 1996).

86 F.3d 1147 (United States v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.