United States v. Paul
73 M.J. 206
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 24, 2014
DocketNo. 14-0119/AF
StatusPublished
This text of 73 M.J. 206 (United States v. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Paul, 73 M.J. 206 (Ark. 2014).
Opinion
CCA S32025. On consideration of the motion filed by Major Zaven T. Saroyan to withdraw as appellate defense counsel, it appears that the Judge Advocate General has assigned another counsel to represent Appellant and that the new attorney has assumed the representation of said Appellant. Accordingly, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
73 M.J. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-paul-armfor-2014.