United States v. Parsons

367 F.3d 409
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Parsons. Read the opinion of the Court — 367 F.3d 409
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2003·No. 01-50464·Published

Opinion

333 F.3d 549

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ESTATE OF Andrew Clyde PARSONS as Represented by its Independent Executor, Patrick D. Millar, Appellant.

No. 01-50464.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 3, 2003.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Joseph A. Florio, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David L. Botsford, Law Office of David L. Botsford, Austin, TX, Herbert V. Larson, Jr. (argued), New Orleans, LA, for Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Carl J. Barbier, Judge.

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Dec. 11, 2002, 5 Cir., 2002, 314 F.3d 745)

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Parsons, 367 F.3d 409 (5th Cir. 2003).

367 F.3d 409 (United States v. Parsons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Estate of Parsons ex rel. Millar
314 F.3d 745 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Estate of Parsons ex rel. Millar
333 F.3d 549 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)