United States v. Estate of Parsons ex rel. Millar

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Estate of Parsons ex rel. Millar

333 F.3d 549, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11114, 2003 WL 21277400

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 3, 2003·No. No. 01-50464·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

United States v. Estate of Parsons ex rel. Millar, 333 F.3d 549, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11114, 2003 WL 21277400 (5th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

333 F.3d 549 (United States v. Estate of Parsons ex rel. Millar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related