United States v. Parsons
This text of 367 F.3d 409 (United States v. Parsons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ESTATE OF Andrew Clyde PARSONS as Represented by its Independent Executor, Patrick D. Millar, Appellant.
No. 01-50464.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 3, 2003.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Joseph A. Florio, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
David L. Botsford, Law Office of David L. Botsford, Austin, TX, Herbert V. Larson, Jr. (argued), New Orleans, LA, for Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Carl J. Barbier, Judge.
ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion Dec. 11, 2002, 5 Cir., 2002, 314 F.3d 745)
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
367 F.3d 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-parsons-ca5-2003.