United States v. Nichols
This text of 784 F.3d 666 (United States v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
This matter is before the court on the appellant’s Petition for Rehearing En [667]*667Banc. We also have a response from the government. Upon consideration of the implicit request for panel rehearing contained in the petition, the request is denied by a majority of the original panel members.
The en banc petition was also transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service. Upon review, a poll was called, and a majority of the active judges voted to deny the en banc suggestion. Consequently, that request is likewise denied. Judges Lucero, Gorsuch, Matheson and Moritz would grant the en banc petition.
Judges Lucero and Gorsuch have written separately in dissent from the denial of the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
784 F.3d 666, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6148, 2015 WL 1727385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-nichols-ca10-2015.