United States v. Neal
Opinion
[172]*172Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ronald Christopher Neal appeals the district court’s order denying in part his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Neal, No. 2:94-cr-00300-JABM (M.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
436 F. App'x 171 (United States v. Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.