United States v. Neal

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 11, 2011·No. 10-6861·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6861

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ROBERT NEAL, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (0:02-cr-01392-CMC-1)

Submitted: January 10, 2011 Decided: February 11, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Neal, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Neal, Sr., appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.

Crim. P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Neal, No. 0:02-cr-

01392-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Neal, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Neal (United States v. Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.