United States v. Nagy

124 F. App'x 217
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2005·No. 04-7698·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Paul Nagy appeals the district court’s order denying Nagy’s motions for recusal of the district judge, disqualification of the Federal Public Defender’s Office, and expedited consideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Nagy, No. CA-98-951-5-BR (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 1, 2004; entered Sept. 2, 2004). We deny as moot Nagy’s motion to expedite consideration of this appeal, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion to strike Appellee’s informal brief is denied.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Nagy, 124 F. App'x 217 (4th Cir. 2005).

124 F. App'x 217 (United States v. Nagy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.