United States v. Nagy

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 22, 2004·No. 03-7606·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7606

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner - Appellee,

versus

PAUL NAGY,

Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-951-5-BR)

Submitted: March 15, 2004 Decided: July 22, 2004

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Alan DuBois, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Michael David Bredenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Paul Nagy appeals the district court’s order denying

Nagy’s motion for recusal of the district judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 455 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See United States v. Nagy, No. CA-98-951-5-BR

(E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Nagy, (4th Cir. 2004).

United States v. Nagy (United States v. Nagy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related