United States v. Nagy
103 F. App'x 510
Opinion
Paul Nagy appeals the district court’s order denying Nagy’s motion for recusal of the district judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Nagy, No. CA-98-951-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Nagy, 103 F. App'x 510 (4th Cir. 2004).
103 F. App'x 510 (United States v. Nagy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge
28 U.S.C. § 455