United States v. Munoz
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-50260 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MANUEL RIOJAS MUNOZ, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-93-CR-136-3 -------------------- December 3,2001 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Manuel Riojas Munoz, Jr., federal prisoner #65177-080, has
filed a letter disputing the applicability of the certificate-of-
appealability (COA) requirement to his appeal from the denial of
a petition for a writ of coram nobis. Because Munoz is appealing
the denial of coram nobis relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1651, he does
not need a COA in order for his appeal to proceed. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1). To the extent his letter requests a waiver of the
COA requirement, his request is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY. We
conclude, however, that the district court properly denied
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-50260 -2-
Munoz’s petition for a writ of coram nobis given that he is still
in custody for his offenses of conviction. See United States v.
Hatten, 167 F.3d 884, 887 n.6 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we
dispense with any further briefing and DISMISS his appeal as
FRIVOLOUS. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Munoz (United States v. Munoz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.