United States v. Morales

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Morales. Read the opinion of the Court — 397 F. App'x 883
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 4, 2009·No. 08-8421·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8421

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANDRES MORALES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:05-cr-00322-RDB-4)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 4, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andres Morales, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Andres Morales appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006), and on his motion for reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Morales, No. 1:05-cr-00322-RDB-4 (D.

Md. Oct. 7, 2008; Oct. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Morales, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Morales (United States v. Morales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related