United States v. Morales
This text of United States v. Morales (United States v. Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8421
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDRES MORALES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:05-cr-00322-RDB-4)
Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 4, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andres Morales, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Andres Morales appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006), and on his motion for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Morales, No. 1:05-cr-00322-RDB-4 (D.
Md. Oct. 7, 2008; Oct. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Morales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-morales-ca4-2009.