United States v. Mimms

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6633

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

REGINALD MIMMS, a/k/a Gerald King,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:99-cr-00048-JCT)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 19, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Mimms, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Reginald Mimms appeals the district court's order

denying his motion for a writ of audita querela, pursuant to the

All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Mimms’ motion for a transcript at Government expense and affirm

the district court’s order. See United States v. Mimms,

No. 7:99-cr-00048-JCT (W.D. Va. March 17, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED