United States v. Mimms
This text of United States v. Mimms (United States v. Mimms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6633
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
REGINALD MIMMS, a/k/a Gerald King,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:99-cr-00048-JCT)
Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 19, 2009
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Mimms, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Reginald Mimms appeals the district court's order
denying his motion for a writ of audita querela, pursuant to the
All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Mimms’ motion for a transcript at Government expense and affirm
the district court’s order. See United States v. Mimms,
No. 7:99-cr-00048-JCT (W.D. Va. March 17, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Mimms, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mimms-ca4-2009.