United States v. Milton

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Milton. Read the opinion of the Court — 182 F. App'x 209
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2008·No. 08-7473·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7473

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GREGORY A. MILTON, a/k/a G,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:95-cr-70074-sgw-1)

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 20, 2008

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory A. Milton, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gregory A. Milton appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000), and denying reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Milton, No. 5:95-cr-70074-sgw-1 (W.D. Va. July 9 & 24,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Milton, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Milton (United States v. Milton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related