United States v. Milton

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Milton

296 F. App'x 356

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Milton. Read the opinion of the Court — 182 F. App'x 209 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2008·No. No. 08-7473·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gregory A. Milton appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Milton, No. 5:95-cr-70074-sgw-l (W.D.Va. July 9 & 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten[357]*357tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gregory A. Milton appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Milton, No. 5:95-cr-70074-sgw-l (W.D.Va. July 9 & 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten[357]*357tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Milton, 296 F. App'x 356 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

296 F. App'x 356 (United States v. Milton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related