United States v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 4, 1998·No. 98-6221·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6221

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HARVEY WILSON MILLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-106-R, CA-97-202-R)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harvey Wilson Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Miller, Nos. CR-94-106-R; CA-97-202-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 27, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Miller, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Miller (United States v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related