United States v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 1997·No. 97-6080·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6080

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDWARD LEON MILLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-93-137, CA-95-844)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Leon Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) motion and motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinions and the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Miller, Nos. CR-93-137; CA-95-844 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 15 & Dec. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Miller, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Miller (United States v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related