United States v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 2, 1996·No. 96-7039·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7039

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES ANDERSON MILLER, a/k/a Sonny Miller, a/k/a Bubba,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-90-60, CA-96-434-5-BR)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Anderson Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Daniel Potter, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Miller, Nos. CR-90-60; CA-96-434-5-BR (E.D.N.C. June 26, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Miller, (4th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Miller (United States v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related