United States v. Michael Jones
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6861
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL DEMONTE JONES, a/k/a Mike Jones,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:08-cr-00396-FL-1)
Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: November 4, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Demonte Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michael Demonte Jones appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) to
reduce sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Jones, No.
5:08-cr-00396-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. May 23, 2014). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Michael Jones (United States v. Michael Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.