United States v. Michael Jones

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Michael Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 685 F. App'x 294
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 4, 2014·No. 14-6861·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6861

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL DEMONTE JONES, a/k/a Mike Jones,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:08-cr-00396-FL-1)

Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: November 4, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Demonte Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Demonte Jones appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) to

reduce sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Jones, No.

5:08-cr-00396-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. May 23, 2014). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Michael Jones, (4th Cir. 2014).

United States v. Michael Jones (United States v. Michael Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related