United States v. Michael Jones

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7828

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL EDWARD JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:96-cr-00123-GCM-1)

Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 23, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Edward Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Edward Jones appeals a district court order

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court denied the motion

because the Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 750 did not result

in a change to the Guidelines sentence. We have reviewed the

record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED