United States v. Merlyn A. Yagow

953 F.2d 423, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 188, 69 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1415, 1992 WL 1567
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 1992
Docket91-2319
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 953 F.2d 423 (United States v. Merlyn A. Yagow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Merlyn A. Yagow, 953 F.2d 423, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 188, 69 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1415, 1992 WL 1567 (8th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Merlyn Yagow appeals his conviction on one count of attempting to interfere with the administration of internal revenue laws in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a) (1988). A jury also found Yagow guilty of two counts of fraud and false statements under penalties of perjury in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) (1988). The charges are based on Yagow’s sending false IRS 1099 forms to individuals and institutions involved in the liquidation of his farm and his filing of those forms with the IRS. Yagow argues on appeal that there is no evidence to show that he “corruptly” endeavored to interfere with the administration of the internal revenue laws as required by 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a). We affirm the judgment of the district court. 1

Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, Yagow borrowed substantial sums of money from the Production Credit Association in an effort to sustain his farming operation. In 1985, he defaulted on his loans and Production Credit filed suit against Yagow to collect the debt. After authorities started repossessing Yagow’s machinery and grain, Yagow filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. The equipment was then returned to Yagow pending resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings.

Yagow failed to file a reorganization plan within the exclusive 120-day period allotted to the debtor. The bankruptcy court approved the liquidation plan filed by Yagow’s creditors despite his objection. The court ordered all assets sold and appointed a liquidating trustee.

As law enforcement officials and others acting under court order removed equipment and grain from Yagow’s property, Yagow asked various individuals their names, took their pictures, and recorded the license plate numbers of their cars or trucks. Yagow later contacted the North Dakota Motor Vehicle Department to obtain the names and addresses of the registered owners of the vehicles.

About two years later, Yagow filed an adversary action in bankruptcy court that listed as defendants the individuals involved in the repossession. In this suit, which was dismissed by the district court, Yagow claimed that he was entitled to a $9 million judgment.

*425 In January 1989, Yagow started sending “Notices of Bills Due and Payable” to those who helped remove his equipment and grain, those who purchased his real estate, and those who were involved in the state court prosecution of his son, Kevin, a minor, for possession of alcohol. The recipients included the state trooper who had regulated traffic going in and out of Ya-gow’s farm during the. repossession of the machinery, the truck driver hired to remove the grain, the purchaser of Yagow’s lake home, and two purchasers of his farm land.

The bills claimed that the recipient owed Yagow money for taking or using Yagow’s property or for services Yagow performed. Yagow later sent “past-due” statements, which included interest charges, to these same individuals.

Yagow next sent false IRS forms that treated the property or services allegedly received as the recipient’s taxable gain. To some of his victims, Yagow sent IRS Form 1099-INT, a form used to show the recipient’s interest income. To others, he sent IRS Form 1099-MISC, a form used to report payments that are not W-2 wage payments. Yagow also sent to each victim a W-9 form, which is used by a payer of money to obtain the employer identification number or social security number of the person to whom he has paid the money.

Yagow sent bogus bills and IRS forms to more than 100 people. One recipient, the trucker who hauled away the grain, received a bill of $183,695.03 for “damages” to Yagow’s property. He later received a Form 1099-MISC showing non-employee compensation in that same amount, plus a “past due” statement claiming that he owed an additional $2,755.42 in interest.

Another recipient, the state trooper who directed traffic during the repossession, received a bill of $261,650.00 for removing grain and machinery in alleged violation of the bankruptcy stay. The bill claimed that the money was owed for work Yagow had purportedly done, as well as for 600 hours of attorneys’ services. The bill also included a miscellaneous list of other expenses Yagow supposedly incurred. The trooper received a second bill for $675,886.00, which supposedly charged him for two tractors, a pickup truck, and some shop tools. The trooper never had possession of any of the items for which he was billed. Yagow later mailed to the trooper a W-9 form and two 1099 forms showing income in the amounts of $345,443.00 and $261,-650.00.

Although the vast majority of those receiving Yagow’s bogus bills and IRS forms .had been involved in the liquidation of his farm, he also sent false IRS forms to the prosecuting attorney, state court judge, and highway patrolman who had been involved in the prosecution of his son on the alcohol charge.

At trial, Yagow testified that he sent the bills and IRS forms to “verify” claims for damages that he intended to pursue in court against Production Credit and other parties who had allegedly wronged him. He stated that he had calculated the bills by taking into account the value of the machinery repossessed, the amount of the time he spent “discovering who took it,” and the money he spent on attorneys. Ya-gow admitted that he neither gave money to nor had contracts with any of the individuals to whom he sent the bills or IRS forms, and that he never voluntarily transferred any assets to them.

In addition to sending the 1099-MISC and 1099-INT forms to various individuals, Yagow also sent copies of the forms to the IRS. The 1099 forms were accompanied by a signed Form 1096, which serves as a cover sheet for 1099 forms and includes information on who is submitting the attached 1099 forms, the total number of forms, and the total amount of money listed on the forms. 2 Yagow signed a statement on two separate 1096 forms — one submitted in 1989 and one submitted in *426 1990 — stating that “under penalties of perjury” he declared that he had “examined this return and accompanying documents” and that to the best of his “knowledge and belief they are true, correct, and complete.” The signed statements formed the basis for the two false statement counts on which he was convicted.

Yagow sent 141 of the 1099 forms to the IRS in February 1989, followed by another 39 the following year. The amounts reported on the two 1096 forms did not match the total of the amounts reported on the attached 1099 forms. Yagow explained at trial that the amounts listed on the 1096 forms represented the total of the “actual amount of the bills” he had calculated but that each bill — and corresponding 1099 form — had been sent to more than one individual. Yagow also testified that he would have achieved his goal if his victims had paid him money or returned his property.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Theodore John Nelson, Jr.
676 F. App'x 614 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Peter Giambalvo
810 F.3d 1086 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Richard Mathews
761 F.3d 891 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Saldana
Fifth Circuit, 2005
Major v. Comm'r
2005 T.C. Memo. 141 (U.S. Tax Court, 2005)
United States v. Winchell
129 F.3d 1093 (Tenth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Brennick
908 F. Supp. 1004 (D. Massachusetts, 1995)
United States v. Charles Lloyd Patterson, Sr.
20 F.3d 801 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Bruce Roy Lee
6 F.3d 1297 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Lavon T. Hanson
2 F.3d 942 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Merlyn Dykstra
991 F.2d 450 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Richard M. Mitchell
985 F.2d 1275 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Norbert L. Hildebrandt
961 F.2d 116 (Eighth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
953 F.2d 423, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 188, 69 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1415, 1992 WL 1567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-merlyn-a-yagow-ca8-1992.