United States v. McRae

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McRae. Read the opinion of the Court — 336 F. App'x 301
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 5, 2010·No. 10-6036·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6036

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIE JEROME MCRAE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:98-cr-00037-F-13)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 5, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Jerome McRae, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Willie Jerome McRae appeals the district court’s order

denying his petition for a writ of audita querela. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm. See United States v. Torres, 282 F.3d 1241, 1245

(10th Cir. 2002) (“[A] writ of audita querela is not available

to a petitioner when other remedies exist, such as a motion to

vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.”) (internal quotation

marks omitted). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McRae, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. McRae (United States v. McRae) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Torres
282 F.3d 1241 (Tenth Circuit, 2002)