United States v. McRae

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McRae. Read the opinion of the Court — 336 F. App'x 301
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2010·No. 09-7846·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7846

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIE JEROME MCRAE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:98-cr-00037-F-13)

Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: June 29, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Jerome McRae, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Willie Jerome McRae appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for sentence reduction. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. McRae, No. 5:98-cr-00037-F-13 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 22,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McRae, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. McRae (United States v. McRae) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.