United States v. McRae
Opinion
Michael Scott McRae appeals the district court’s order finding him ineligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McRae, No. 5:97-cr-00094-H-6 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 30, 2009). We deny McRae’s motion to hold his appeal in abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
373 F. App'x 359 (United States v. McRae) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.