United States v. McLean

Fourth Circuit

United States v. McLean

46 F. App'x 721

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McLean. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 F. App'x 183 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 27, 2002·No. 02-6657·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cleveland McLean, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. McLean, No. CR-90-105-N (E.D.Va. Mar. 15, 2002). We grant McLean’s motion to file a supplemental informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Cleveland McLean, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. McLean, No. CR-90-105-N (E.D.Va. Mar. 15, 2002). We grant McLean’s motion to file a supplemental informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. McLean, 46 F. App'x 721 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

46 F. App'x 721 (United States v. McLean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.