United States v. McLean
This text of 3 F. App'x 21 (United States v. McLean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cleveland McLean, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion, which the court construed as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate *22 of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. McLean, No. CR-90-105 (E.D.Va. Mar. 14, 2000). We also deny McLean’s motions to vacate the district court’s order and for attorney’s fees. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 F. App'x 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mclean-ca4-2001.