United States v. McLean

13 F. App'x 95
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 27, 2001·No. 00-4904·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following his conviction and sentence for unlawful possession of a weapon by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g) (West 2000), Rafael A. McLean appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence of his possession of a firearm. He contends that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop him, and therefore the discovery of the gun was in violation of the Fourth Amendment. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the parties’ briefs and find no reversible error. See United States v.. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 9, 109 S.Ct. 1581, 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying McLean’s motion to suppress. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McLean, 13 F. App'x 95 (4th Cir. 2001).

13 F. App'x 95 (United States v. McLean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Sokolow
490 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1989)