United States v. McKinon

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. McKinon

300 F. App'x 699

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 18, 2008·No. No. 08-13011·Published·Cited by 24 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Joffe, appointed counsel for Corey MeKinon, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McKinon’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

David Joffe, appointed counsel for Corey MeKinon, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McKinon’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. McKinon, 300 F. App'x 699 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

300 F. App'x 699 (United States v. McKinon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related