United States v. McKenzie

368 F. App'x 410
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. McKenzie. Read the opinion of the Court — 318 F. App'x 202
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 5, 2010·No. No. 10-6038·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Sherman McKenzie appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for relief from his criminal judgment, his motion for appointment of counsel, and his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to modify term of imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McKenzie, No. 1:97-cr-00203-MR-1, 2009 WL 4893112 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McKenzie, 368 F. App'x 410 (4th Cir. 2010).

368 F. App'x 410 (United States v. McKenzie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related