United States v. McKenzie

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6038

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ALEXANDER SHERMAN MCKENZIE,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:97-cr-00203-MR-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 5, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander Sherman McKenzie, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alexander Sherman McKenzie appeals the district

court’s order denying his motion for relief from his criminal

judgment, his motion for appointment of counsel, and his 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to modify term of

imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. McKenzie, No. 1:97-cr-

00203-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED