United States v. McCoy
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7473
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TIMOTHY W. MCCOY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CR-92-189)
Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 19, 1997
Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy W. McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (1994). We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. McCoy, No. CR-92-189 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. McCoy (United States v. McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.