United States v. McCoy

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 19, 1997·No. 96-7473·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7473

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY W. MCCOY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CR-92-189)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 19, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy W. McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (1994). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. McCoy, No. CR-92-189 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McCoy, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. McCoy (United States v. McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related