United States v. McCollum

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 2, 2009·No. 09-6631·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6631

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM KELVIN MCCOLLUM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (7:01-cr-00136-BR-1)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Kelvin McCollum, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Kelvin McCollum appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion to reduce his sentence under

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

McCollum, No. 7:01-cr-00136-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. McCollum, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. McCollum (United States v. McCollum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related