United States v. McCollum

474 F. App'x 904
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 2, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6544
StatusPublished

This text of 474 F. App'x 904 (United States v. McCollum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. McCollum, 474 F. App'x 904 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William McCollum, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction of sentence based on Amendments 591, 706, and 711 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, 200 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McCollum, No. 4:00-cr-00988-CWH-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Stewart
595 F.3d 197 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 F. App'x 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mccollum-ca4-2012.