United States v. Maxey

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 20, 2008·No. 08-7152·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7152

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

COREY MAXEY, a/k/a Rosedog,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:98-cr-00014-FPS-2)

Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 20, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey Maxey, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Lynn Potter, United States Attorney, Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Corey Maxey appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2)(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Maxey,

No. 5:98-cr-00014-FPS-2 (N.D.W. Va. June 23, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Maxey, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Maxey (United States v. Maxey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related