United States v. Maxey
This text of United States v. Maxey (United States v. Maxey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7152
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
COREY MAXEY, a/k/a Rosedog,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:98-cr-00014-FPS-2)
Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 20, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Corey Maxey, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Lynn Potter, United States Attorney, Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Corey Maxey appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2)(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Maxey,
No. 5:98-cr-00014-FPS-2 (N.D.W. Va. June 23, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Maxey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maxey-ca4-2008.