United States v. Matthews

305 F. App'x 106
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Matthews. Read the opinion of the Court — 591 F.3d 230
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 29, 2008·No. No. 08-7903·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Barry Lewis Matthews appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Matthews, No. 6:94-cr-70077-JCT-l (W.D.Va. May 1, 2008); 2008 WL 3890376 (Aug. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Matthews, 305 F. App'x 106 (4th Cir. 2008).

305 F. App'x 106 (United States v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related