United States v. Matthews
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7903
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BARRY LEWIS MATTHEWS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (6:94-cr-70077-JCT-1)
Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 29, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry Lewis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Barry Lewis Matthews appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Matthews, No. 6:94-cr-70077-JCT-1 (W.D.
Va. May 1, 2008; Aug. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Matthews (United States v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.