United States v. Matthews

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Matthews. Read the opinion of the Court — 591 F.3d 230
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 29, 2008·No. 08-7903·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7903

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BARRY LEWIS MATTHEWS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (6:94-cr-70077-JCT-1)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 29, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry Lewis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Barry Lewis Matthews appeals the district court’s

orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Matthews, No. 6:94-cr-70077-JCT-1 (W.D.

Va. May 1, 2008; Aug. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Matthews, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Matthews (United States v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related