United States v. Martin

87 F. App'x 392
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 17, 2004
Docket03-20496
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 87 F. App'x 392 (United States v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Martin, 87 F. App'x 392 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

Brian Rhett Martin (“Martin”) appeals the sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. Martin argues that a conflict exists between the district court’s oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment because the written judgment contains a condition of supervised release prohibiting the possession of a dangerous weapon while the court did not mention this prohibition at the sentencing hearing. His argument is foreclosed by this court’s decision in United States v. Torres-Aguilar, 352 F.3d 934, 937-38 (5th Cir.2003). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Martin
145 F. App'x 958 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
No. 03-10272
542 U.S. 912 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 F. App'x 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-martin-ca5-2004.