No. 03-10272

542 U.S. 912
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 14, 2004
StatusPublished

This text of 542 U.S. 912 (No. 03-10272) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
No. 03-10272, 542 U.S. 912 (2004).

Opinion

542 U.S. 912

NEWSOME
v.
UNITED STATES (Reported below: 89 Fed. Appx. 466);
MARTIN
v.
UNITED STATES (87 Fed. Appx. 392);
CHIMNEY
v.
UNITED STATES (88 Fed. Appx. 77);
SONGALIA FLORES
v.
UNITED STATES (___ Fed. Appx. ___);
VILLARREAL-MEDINA
v.
UNITED STATES (87 Fed. Appx. 395);
ABNEY
v.
UNITED STATES (87 Fed. Appx. 960);
GUERRERO
v.
UNITED STATES (87 Fed. Appx. 990);
AGUILAR-CORTEZ
v.
UNITED STATES (87 Fed. Appx. 937);
AVILA-CHAVEZ
v.
UNITED STATES (87 Fed. Appx. 433);
HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ
v.
UNITED STATES (87 Fed. Appx. 425);
DE LOS SANTOS
v.
UNITED STATES (87 Fed. Appx. 421);
MEDINA-TENIENTE
v.
UNITED STATES (87 Fed. Appx. 978); and
DE LUNA-VIGIL
v.
UNITED STATES (87 Fed. Appx. 976).

No. 03-10272.

Supreme Court of United States.

June 14, 2004.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. De Luna-Vigil
87 F. App'x 976 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Martin
87 F. App'x 392 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Avila-Chavez
87 F. App'x 433 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez
87 F. App'x 425 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. De Los Santos
87 F. App'x 421 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Newsome
89 F. App'x 466 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Rangel-Orduna
87 F. App'x 937 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Cera-De La Cruz
87 F. App'x 960 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Salazar-Gonzalez
87 F. App'x 990 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
542 U.S. 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/no-03-10272-scotus-2004.